![]() ![]() ![]() And at its centre is a character whose identity is shifting: not Dil, but Fergus. It’s a film about shifting identities whose own identity is in constant flux: it’s a thriller, a romance, something else entirely. It has a deft touch for the nuances of gender and sexuality, but it’s about so, so much more than that. Mainstream understanding of trans people has transformed so quickly so recently that a film from 1992 sounds like an ancient artefact.īut The Crying Game is an incredibly rich, complex, and beautiful film. ![]() It’s good to re-examine representation of trans characters from the past, obviously, but it can be reductive when historical transness is purely viewed through modern lenses. When critics revisit The Crying Game now, it’s mostly to measure its understanding of trans people against our modern sensibilities. And in isolation, it makes The Crying Game sound like a relic, in a way I’m sure puts people off watching it. To some extent, that reputation was deliberately cultivated: after flopping in the UK, it became a hit in the US with a marketing campaign built around the twist. If you know anything about The Crying Game, it’s this scene. Dil meekly says she thought that he already knew. Fergus’s reaction is, to say the least, not great: he hits her in his attempt to push her away, and he throws up in the bathroom. She takes off her robe and the camera tilts down her body to show a penis. Fergus (Stephen Rea, it wouldn’t be a Neil Jordan film without Stephen Rea) is about to have sex with Dil (Jaye Davidson) for the first time, when it’s revealed – both to Fergus and the audience – that she is transgender. The Crying Game has been reduced to a single scene in the public imagination. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |